Which two tactics are considered manipulative tactics used by inmates to influence staff?

The rationale behind "Power / Control" as manipulative tactics used by inmates to influence staff lies in the dynamics of authority and dominance that can exist in a correctional environment. Inmates may attempt to exert power over the staff to gain concessions or favorable treatment. This behavior can manifest in various ways, including challenging staff authority, attempting to intimidate, or leveraging status to instill a sense of fear or obligation.

Understanding these tactics is crucial for staff because it helps them recognize when they are being manipulated, allowing them to maintain their professional boundaries and effective control of the facility.

While isolation and fear, threats and promises, and trust and cooperation may also play roles in inmate interactions with staff, they do not specifically emphasize the overarching strategies of power dynamics in the same way that power and control do. For example, threats and promises are more direct forms of manipulation, while trust and cooperation suggest a more benign interaction. Thus, the emphasis on "Power / Control" accurately captures the broader and more systemic issues that can arise within this context, highlighting the need for staff to be vigilant and aware of their own authority in order to manage their interactions effectively.