Which of the following is not a technique for effective testimony?

Subjectivity is not a technique for effective testimony because effective testimony relies on objective facts and clear, unbiased communication. When providing testimony, the focus should be on delivering information that is factual, precise, and verifiable, which will help uphold the credibility of the testimony. Clarity, consistency, and confidence are all essential for ensuring that the testimony is understood by the audience (such as a judge or jury) and is taken seriously. Clarity aids in conveying messages straightforwardly, consistency ensures that the testimony is reliable and trustworthy, and confidence conveys certainty about the information being presented. In contrast, subjectivity can introduce personal opinions and biases, which can undermine the reliability of the testimony and lead to confusion or misinterpretation.