What does "official oppression" generally refer to in the context of corrections officers?

"Official oppression" in the context of corrections officers primarily refers to the act of intentionally denying services or benefits to individuals under their supervision, usually in a manner that is unjust and abuses their position of authority. This term encompasses actions in which a corrections officer deliberately disregards an inmate's rights or fails to provide them with necessary services, such as medical care or access to legal resources, essentially using their power to inflict harm or hardship.

In many jurisdictions, this type of conduct is seen as a violation of the rights of individuals, and it reflects a misuse of the authority granted to corrections personnel. This aligns with the broader legal definition, where officials acting under the color of law commit perceived injustices by exploiting their power for personal or malicious intents, rather than fulfilling their duty to serve and protect the well-being of those in their custody.

Other choices, while they may indicate various forms of misconduct or negligence, do not capture the essence of "official oppression" as directly tied to the intentional denial of services. For example, discriminatory practices may involve bias or unequal treatment but do not necessarily encompass the deliberate denial of services. Negligence in duty refers to failing to perform required actions due to carelessness rather than intentional wrongdoing. Improper use of force denotes